|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promises, Premises, and Published Data¡¦ |
|
Claims unsubstantiated for embryonic stem cells |
|
Current or potential embryonic stem cell
problems: |
|
Difficult to establish and maintain |
|
Difficulty in obtaining pure cultures in the
dish |
|
Potential for tumor formation and tissue
destruction
*Wakitani S et al.; ¡°Embryonic stem cells injected
into the mouse knee joint form teratomas and subsequently destroy the
joint¡±; Rheumatology 42, 162-165; January 2003 |
|
Questions regarding functional
differentiation
*Hansson M et al., ¡°Artifactual insulin release
from differentiated embryonic stem cells¡±, Diabetes 53, 2603-2609, October
2004
*Sipione S et al., ¡°Insulin expressing cells from
differentiated embryonic stem cells are not beta cells¡±, Diabetologia 47,
499-508, 2004 (published online 14 Feb 2004)
*Rajagopal J et al.;
¡°Insulin staining of ES cell progeny from insulin uptake¡±; Science 299, 363; 17 Jan 2003
*Zhang
YM et al.; ¡°Stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes demonstrate arrhythmic
potential¡±; Circulation 106, 1294-1299; 3 September 2002 |
|
Problem of immune rejection |
|
Genomic instability
*Cowan CA et al.,
¡°Derivation of embryonic stem-cell lines from human blastocysts¡±, New
England Journal of Medicine 350, 13; published online 3 March 2004
*Draper JS et
al., ¡°Recurrent gain of chromosomes 17q and 12 in cultured human embryonic
stem cells¡±, Nature Biotechnology 22, 53-54; January 2004
*Humpherys D et
al.; ¡°Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice¡±; Science 293,
95-97; 6 July 2001 |
|
Few and modest successes in animals, no clinical
treatments |
|
Ethically contentious |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cloning is unsafe for the clone and surrogate
mother |
|
The numbers are against survival |
|
Dolly the sheep, first cloned mammal: 1 live birth out of 277 cloned
embryos (0.4%) |
|
Cloned mice: 5 live births out of 613 cloned embryos (0.8%)
5 live births out of 314
cloned embryos implanted (1.6%) (0.3%; 1 survived)
26 live births out of 312
cloned embryos implanted (8.3%) (4.2%; 13 survived) |
|
Cloned pigs: 5 live births out of 72 cloned embryos implanted (7%) |
|
Cloned goats: 3 live births out of 85 cloned embryos implanted (3.5%) |
|
Cloned cattle: 30 live births out of 496 cloned embryos implanted (6%)
(4.8%; 24 survived) |
|
Cloned cat: 1 live birth out of 188 cloned embryos (0.5%); of 87 embryos implanted (1.1%) |
|
Cloned gaur: 1 live birth out of 692 cloned
embryos (81 blastocysts) (0.1%) (0%; 0 survived) |
|
Cloned rabbits: 6 live births out of 1852 cloned
embryos (0.3%) (0.2%; 4 survived) |
|
Cloned banteng: 2 live births out of 30 cloned
embryos implanted (6.7%) (3.3%; 1 survived) |
|
Cloned mule (fetal cells): 3 live births out of
334 cloned embryos (0.9%) |
|
Cloned horse: 1 live birth out of 841 cloned
embryos (0.1%) |
|
Cloned rats: 3 live births out of 129 cloned embryos implanted (2.3%)
(1.6%; 2 survived) |
|
Even apparently healthy clones have gene
expression abnormalities.
*Humpherys D et al.; ¡°Epigenetic
instability in ES cells and cloned mice¡±; Science 293, 95-97; 6 July
2001
*Humpherys D et al.; ¡°Abnormal gene expression in cloned mice
derived from embryonic stem cell and cumulus cell nuclei¡±; Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12889-12894; 1 October 2002 |
|
A review of all the world¡¯s cloned animals
suggests that every one of them is defective.
Ian Wilmut: ¡°There
is abundant evidence that cloning can and does go wrong and no
justification for believing that this will not happen with humans.¡±
¡°Gene
defects emerge in all animal clones¡±, Sunday Times of London, April 28,
2002 |
|
|
|
Health risk for the surrogate mother—¡°large
offspring syndrome¡± |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clones may need to be gestated to
¡°harvest¡±already-differentiated tissues
*R Lanza et al.;
¡°Generation of histocompatible tissue using nuclear transplantation,¡± Nature
Biotechnology 20, 689-696; July 2002 (published online 3 June 2002)
*R
Lanza et al., ¡°Regeneration of the infarcted heart with stem cells derived
by nuclear transplantation,¡± Circulation Research 94, 820-827, April 2004
(published online 10 Feb 2004) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Clinical Uses of Adult Stem Cells |
|
Cancers—Lymphomas, multiple myeloma, leukemias,
breast cancer, neuroblastoma, renal cell carcinoma, ovarian cancer |
|
Autoimmune diseases—multiple sclerosis, systemic
lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, scleromyxedema, Crohn¡¯s disease |
|
Anemias (incl. sickle cell anemia) |
|
Immunodeficiencies—including human gene therapy |
|
Bone/cartilage deformities—children with
osteogenesis imperfecta |
|
Corneal scarring-generation of new corneas to
restore sight |
|
Stroke—neural cell implants in clinical trials |
|
Repairing cardiac tissue after heart attack—bone
marrow or muscle stem cells from patient |
|
Parkinson¡¯s—retinal stem cells, patient¡¯s own
neural stem cells, injected growth factors |
|
Growth of new blood vessels—e.g., preventing
gangrene |
|
Gastrointestinal epithelia—regenerate damaged
ulcerous tissue |
|
Skin—grafts grown from hair follicle stem cells,
after plucking a few hairs from patient |
|
Wound healing—bone marrow stem cells stimulated
skin healing |
|
Spinal cord injury—clinical trials currently in
Portugal, Italy, S. Korea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethical Questions about Embryo Research |
|
Unethical? |
|
to destroy human embryos |
|
to destroy human embryos for stem cells if there
is a viable alternative |
|
to experiment with humans before work is
verified in animals |
|
because embryonic stem cells pose significant
risks |
|
Tumors |
|
Transplant rejection |
|
Instability in gene expression |
|
because it would divert limited funds to less
promising research and potentially delay cures |
|
|
|
|
Problems Regarding Human Cloning |
|
Any evidence that cloning is necessary or useful
for medical treatments? |
|
Will cloning research divert resources and delay
cures? |
|
Is banning implantation unenforceable? |
|
Possible reproduction of living or deceased
persons without knowledge or consent? |
|
Confusion—kinship, parent-child identity,
parental expectations? |
|
Creating a class of humans who exist only as a
means to achieve the ends of others? |
|
Risking health and exploitation of women? |
|
Leading to commercialization of human life? |
|
Gateway to genetic manipulation and control of
human beings? |
|
Unsafe, Unethical, Unnecessary |
|
|
|
|
Euthanasia |
|
Actively committing or encouraging the taking of
human life. |
|
¡°Noble¡± death, or getting rid of unwanted
burdens? |
|
Utilitarian, considering vulnerable people as
things, of lesser value, less than fully human. |
|
Compassion for pain and suffering. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What does it mean to be human? |
|
Person or property? |
|
To whom do we choose to assign value? |
|
Who will benefit? Who will decide? |
|
|
|
|
|